gitlab vs azure devops

Comparing the two products, one gets the impression that Microsoft is trying to hide the additional costs and is not as transparent as GitLab. This suggests that the final cost might be higher than presented in this comparison. In the case of Azure DevOps, the user has two financing plans at their disposal, which also look good – but additional costs should be taken into account. To standardize this list for my comparison, I chose the pros and cons presented in the GitLab and Microsoft articles.

Azure DevOps vs GitHub: Which DevOps tool is better?

Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code. According to GitLab, their product has more advantages than Microsoft’s. Similarly – Microsoft shows a very long list of the strengths of Azure DevOps in comparison to GitLab’s tool. Comparing the market leaders among DevOps tools, such as GitLab and Azure, can be quite a complicated process – or even impossible. That’s because DevOps tools are usually very powerful and offer a wide range of functionalities. In this article, we will try to objectively discuss the differences between self-managed GitLab and Azure DevOps Server.

  1. As with any organization, CapEx or OpEx directly impacts their bottom line.
  2. In addition, Azure DevOps and GitLab have a repository with hosting facilities for continuous integration and deployment for multiple staging DevOps lifecycles.
  3. You may have security concerns about hosting the code for your new Nicolas Cage image hosting service in the cloud.
  4. If your priority is an all-in-one solution with powerful AI and security features, GitLab is the way to go.

Quick Access to New Features

Continuous integration, or CI, is the process of continually merging any new code into the master/common code base and building it to make sure nothing is broken. “Fail early” is one of the mantras connected to CI, the thought being that the earlier you find bugs, the easier and cheaper they are to fix. In the next sections, we will dive into each of these platforms to get a better understanding of their feature set.

Support & Services

Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. GitLab has a comparatively smaller community and a limited set of third-party integration options compared to GitHub, which can be complex for new users. The primary caveat of GitLab is that most advanced features are only available for paid users, and ultimate versions can get quite expensive. Version control is the backbone of any software development pipeline, enabling multiple users to simultaneously develop the same code base. It also acts as a single source of truth with a perfectly kept history of all the codebase changes. Gitlab and Azure Devops can be used for different purposes and are well-suited for teams with specific needs.

Suitable for Work Planning

For that reason it also offers more significant functionality than Azure DevOps, like project schemes, secret management, AWS support, IDE in the browser and Google Cloud server support tools. Previously known as the Team Foundation Server (TFS), the former is a DevOps server solution for on premise deployments. Users can install it in any environment, and it also comes with all the tools available in the cloud based DevOps service to power any DevOps channel. First of all GitLab is a DevOps software platform created by Ukrainian developer Dmitriy Zaporozhets and Dutch developer Sytse Sijbrandij, released in October 2011. The open source software project combines the ability to develop, secure and operate software in a single application.

Azure DevOps and GitLab both provide integrated continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) pipelines that enable teams to build, test, and release code more quickly and efficiently. Azure DevOps has an intuitive pipeline editor that allows for easy creation of build and deployment pipelines. GitLab, however, goes a step further with a built-in container registry, allowing for seamless containerization and deployment. However, the list of disadvantages that we cannot agree with is somewhat longer.

gitlab vs azure devops

Lastly, it has a subscription plan with even more features that focus on security, compliance and planning. Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus.

gitlab vs azure devops

Azure DevOps has a more cluttered interface and a less intuitive documentation that may confuse you or make you miss some important details. While the adoption of DevOps grew because of the cloud world, it’s possible to stretch the concepts across hybrid environments or pure on-premises data centers as well. DevOps is a set of practices that aims to improve the collaboration and efficiency of software development and IT operations teams. It enables faster delivery of value to customers, higher quality software, and the building of more reliable and secure systems. DevOps also fosters a culture of continuous learning and improvement, where teams can experiment, learn from failures, and adapt to changing requirements and feedback. It may take some time to fully move over from Azure to GitLab for source code management.

To create more complex pipelines, you can use the pipeline templates that are shipped with GitLab instead of starting it from scracth. Recently we’ve been asked by several people if it is possible to integrate between Azure DevOps/VSTS (Visual Studio Team Services) source code management and GitLab. They are looking for a modern CI/CD solution like GitLab, but as part of a gradual transition they still need to keep managing their code in Azure DevOps/VSTS. All those comparisons are well and good, but seeing as the two products are so similar, why does Microsoft have two? Part of the reason is that GitHub was becoming both a huge repository of Microsoft code, plus it was also a big competitor.

Before pushing your first commit, open the CI/CD settings in GitLab and enable Auto DevOps. It will set the CI/CD configuration, so each commit in Azure Repos will trigger a CI/CD pipeline in GitLab which will build, test, and deploy your app. GitLab can help manage the entire DevSecOps lifecycle to deliver software quickly and efficiently while bolstering security and compliance.

To smooth the transition, there are simple steps to connect to the Azure integration from GitLab. BitBucket offers a free version up to five users with a relatively cheap premium option compared to other platforms. As a product managed by Atlassian, BitBucket shines when interacting with other popular Atlassian products such as Jira, Confluence, Trello, Opsgenie, etc. This makes Bitbucket the go-to choice if the organization relies on other Atlassian products.

The project management side of things in Azure DevOps is Azure Boards, which has its roots in TFS, and is a very mature product. As well as working seamlessly with other parts of Azure DevOps, Boards has over 1,000 extensions for integrating with other systems. Get notifications on Slack, hook into AWS services, or create automated documentation.

It does offer some additional features and tools, such as GitHub Actions, GitHub Packages, or GitHub Pages, but they’re not as extensive or integrated as Azure DevOps. You may need to use other platforms or tools for some DevOps tasks, such as project management, testing, or monitoring. You can also integrate GitHub with other tools and services, such as Azure DevOps, Slack, or Jenkins, but you may have to deal with multiple interfaces, identities, and security models. Azure DevOps and GitHub are both powerful platforms that offer DevOps solutions for software development teams.

You can also create and share your own actions, packages, or pages with your team or with the public. Version control platforms have evolved beyond simple source control functionality and offer a wide range of features from robust collaboration features to automation and even complete build pipelines. These extra features will become even more valuable with most organizations moving to DevOps methods. Although the page says we do not, we support JUnit and Java testing natively via our support for unit test reports.

Primarily Azure DevOps is designed for closed source projects, whereas GitLab is designed for open source projects. Taking into account all of the extensions and additional packages, the tools include similar functions. The main difference is that Azure DevOps firmly binds the user to the entire Microsoft ecosystem and is only seemingly cheaper.